Zimmer, a biology writer for the New York Times, allows readers to see
the test and the results by going through the experiment with them. Any reader with a curiosity for life
and nature would enjoy this piece. With something as fascinating as elephants holding
a human characteristic, who wouldn’t want to read this article? Zimmer’s
purpose in writing this piece was to show readers the new discovery on how
elephants, most likely, get the point of pointing.
The author uses counterarguments and quotes in
order to achieve his purpose, which I believe was successful. At the end of the
piece, Zimmer quotes an expert on elephant cognition named Diana Reiss who
points out flaws Byrne and Smet’s experiment. These flaws include how the
elephants used were from an elephant camp and how they might have learned
pointing from their human caretakers. I also think that by quoting Byrne and
Smet, Zimmer was able to enhance his article by allowing the biologists’ voices
to come through as well as his own. Both of these strategies help Zimmer
achieve him purpose of showing how elephants get the point of pointing.
No comments:
Post a Comment